Fragrance Guide
Fragrance. This guide is one of the rating systems behind the Interior Medicine Method.
By Dr. Meg Christensen | Physician-founder of Interior Medicine, a non-toxic home resource built on her background in medicine, biochemistry, epidemiology, and clinical research.
Published Oct 27, 2026 | Updated Oct 27, 2026
What This Guide Covers
Table of Contents
Hazard Lists & Third-Party Certifications for Fragrance
Who decides what fragrances are toxic: the EU, IFRA, IARC, and Prop 65
Part 1 of a Fragrance: Scent
Natural vs synthetic scents
Are all 100% pure organic and natural essential oils safe?
Scent ingredient disclosure by brands
Part 2 of a Fragrance: Scent Carriers
Solvents
Phthalates
Surfactants
Part 3 of a Fragrance: Substrate
Dyes and colorants in a candle that burn too
Preservatives
Polymers in gel candles, xxx
Candle wicks
Resins in incense
Part 4 of a Fragrance: Dispersal Method
Burning vs. smoldering vs. evaporation vs. nebulizing
Odor Eliminators
FYI: How and why I use the words non-toxic, chemical-free, toxin, and toxic
Fragrance Rating Scale
This scale is a summary of all the information below. Scales keep me consistent and unbiased as I rate and rank products for their potential impact on your health and they’re meant to organize the information in a straightforward way for you, too. Keep reading for the full breakdown on the reasoning behind it, and how to make smart decisions about glass in your home.
Glass Rating Scale
TIER 01
Healthiest
Description
Plain modern glass with no surface coatings
- Modern soda-lime glass (drinkware, food jars, dishware, tempered cookware lids)
- Modern borosilicate glass (heat-resistant bakeware, glass cooking pots, glass kettles, glass mugs)
Look for
- "Soda-lime glass" or "borosilicate glass" listed as the material on the product page
- Uncoated, unprinted, unpainted drinkware, food storage, and bakeware
- "Tempered glass" on bakeware and lids; tempering is a heat treatment of the glass itself rather than an applied coating
Ask the brand
- Is this glass uncoated on both inside and outside surfaces?
- For colored glass: is the color from minerals melted into the glass during manufacturing, or from a coating applied to the surface? Melted-in keeps it at Tier 1; an applied colored coating moves it lower depending on the coating chemistry.
In practice
- The most common form of safe glass in the home, widely available across every price point and use category
- Borosilicate handles thermal shock better than tempered soda-lime (going freezer-to-oven, for example), at a higher price. Either works for food contact.
TIER 02
Healthy
Description
Modern glass with stable mineral additives melted into the glass matrix rather than applied as a surface coating
- Modern lead-free crystal made with barium oxide, zinc oxide, or potassium oxide substituted for lead oxide. These create the optical brilliance lead used to provide, and the substituted minerals are bound into the glass once melted.
- Modern opal or milk glass made with titanium dioxide and tin oxide opacifiers, which produce the opaque white appearance and are bound into the glass matrix rather than sitting on the surface
Look for
- "Lead-free crystal," or specific mention of barium, zinc, or potassium as the substituted mineral
- "Opal glass" or "milk glass" with current (non-vintage) production
Ask the brand
- For crystal: is this lead-free, and what mineral was substituted for lead oxide?
In practice
- Modern lead-free crystal is increasingly the default at the premium end of glassware. If the label says "crystal" without "lead-free," it may still contain lead until confirmed.
- Modern milk glass with safe opacifiers is the current production standard. The risk is buying vintage pieces (pre-1970s) without knowing the difference, which moves the same item to Tier 5.
TIER 05
Harmful
Description
Glass containing lead and heavy metals
- Vintage lead crystal
- Vintage milk glass (pre-1970s) made with bone ash, arsenic, or antimony opacifiers
- Vintage colored glass including Depression glass and uranium glass
You'll see
- Crystal without "lead-free" specified. Watch out for "crystal" by itself, which historically meant leaded glass; modern usage requires "lead-free crystal" to mean what it sounds like.
- Vintage or antique milk glass without specific production dates
- Depression glass, uranium glass, or Vaseline glass
Ask the brand
- For crystal: is this lead-free?
- For vintage milk glass: do you know the production date and the opacifier chemistry? Pre-1970s production is typically the dividing line.
In practice
- Vintage lead crystal is widely available at estate sales, antique shops, and through inherited family pieces. Display use is low-risk; food and beverage contact, especially acidic and especially stored over time, is where the lead exposure happens.
- Modern glassware sold in the US rarely lands in Tier 5 unless it carries a Prop 65 warning. The trap is almost always with inherited or thrifted pieces, where you have to identify the production era yourself.
HAZARD
Decoder
AB 1200
AB 1200 is a California right-to-know law for cookware and food-contact items, including glass bakeware, mixing bowls, food storage, cooking pots, and drinkware. It requires brands to disclose, both on the product label and on their website, whether any chemicals on California's designated list were intentionally added to the food-contact surface or handle. It isn't about exposure limits or whether a chemical migrates into food. It's about transparency on what the manufacturer put in.
Prop 65
A Prop 65 warning on a glass product means the brand either knows a listed substance is present above a regulatory limit, or is labeling as a legal precaution. It measures whether your potential exposure meets a certain limit.
Because AB 1200 draws in part from Prop 65, the chemicals flagged by each tend to overlap on any given glass product. Each chemical can look alarming on first glance, but there's more nuance to whether you need to worry. Read below to see what each chemical actually means and what to do about it.
The most common possibilities for an AB 1200 disclosure or Prop 65 warning on glass products are:
- Lead: found in leaded crystal, used as a flux for sparkle and clarity. Still made by some Eastern European, Czech, and Italian producers.
- Cadmium: the pigment source for red, orange, and yellow colored glass, and used in some exterior paint on decorated drinkware.
- Hexavalent chromium: used in some green glass colorants and outside decorations.
- Cobalt (II) oxide: the pigment source of cobalt blue glass, used in some imported decorative and art glass.
- Arsenic: a fining agent (substance added during manufacturing to clear out tiny air bubbles for better clarity) in some imported hand-blown and specialty glass.
- Antimony trioxide: another fining agent used for the same bubble-clearing purpose, and a historical opacifier in some vintage milk glass.
- Titanium dioxide: an opacifier used in modern milk glass and opal glass. Listed only for inhaling fine airborne particles during industrial powder handling, not for eating or drinking from a finished glass piece.
Health concerns. Cancer & DNA damage = a listed or suspected carcinogen or mutagen. Fertility & pregnancy = a listed or suspected reproductive or developmental toxin. Hormone disruption = on an EU endocrine disruptor list. Builds up = very persistent and very bioaccumulative. Allergens = fragrance allergens the EU requires on cosmetic labels above 0.001% in leave-on products and 0.01% in rinse-off products, plus three former allergens it has since banned.
Columns. EU CMR = EU harmonised classification as a carcinogen (Carc.), mutagen (Muta.), or reproductive toxin (Repr.); 1A and 1B are known or presumed, 2 is suspected. IARC = International Agency for Research on Cancer group (2A probably, 2B possibly carcinogenic to humans). Prop 65 = California Proposition 65 listing. EU endocrine = the EU endocrine disruptor lists: List I is identified at EU level, List II is under EU evaluation, List III is identified by a national authority. EU SVHC = EU Substance of Very High Concern, with the reason (vPvB = very persistent and very bioaccumulative). EU allergen = year added to the EU labelled allergen list. IFRA = the fragrance industry’s own standards. EU cosmetics = status in the EU Cosmetics Regulation. A dot means the ingredient isn’t on that list. Entries marked “Added by Interior Medicine” aren’t on the official lists and are included for the reason given.
Sources, as checked October 2026. EU CLP Annex VI, ATP 23; ECHA Candidate List of SVHCs (October 2, 2026); EU endocrine disruptor lists I, II, and III (April 2026 update); IARC List of Classifications, Volumes 1 to 142 (July 23, 2026); California Prop 65 list (July 31, 2026); IFRA Standards, 51st Amendment; EU Cosmetics Regulation Annexes II and III (CosIng) (October 13, 2026); Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 (allergen labelling).
Are Fragrances Toxic?
The EU, IARC, Prop 65 and IFRA have declared certain fragrances carcinogenic, mutagenic, or harmful to reproduction (CMR), toxic to certain organs, endocrine disruptors, bio-accumulative, or allergens that can cause respiratory or skin sensitization.
The European Union (EU) has 6 lists that pertain to fragrance safety:
The EU’s CLP Annex VI: this includes fragrances that are carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic (CMR), as well as respiratory sensitizers (can cause allergic reactions in the airways and lungs.)
The EU’s Annex III: this includes a list of dermal sensitizers (fragrances that cause skin rashes or reactions)
EU Annex II: this is a list of fragrances banned in cosmetics
The EU’s ECHA Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC): this list covers fragrances that bio-accumulate in the body and also has some endocrine disruptors.
The EU Endocrine Disruptor lists: substances identified as endocrine disruptors in the EU
The EU’s Regulation 2023/1545: this contains fragrances that are allergens.
The United States’s EPA Safer Choice Criteria for Fragrance is incredibly comprehensive. It uses some of the EU rules above, and also adds these lists of chemicals below.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) list: this covers chemicals that are carcinogenic to humans, likely to be carcinogenic to humans, or have animal evidence or other suggestive evidence that they could be carcinogenic to humans.
The EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): additional chemicals that are, or might be, carcinogenic to humans.
California’s Prop 65 list: these are the chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive harm.
The EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI): contains chemicals that are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBTs)
The International Fragrance Association’s Prohibited Chemicals list
Health Canada’s Cosmetic Ingredient Prohibited Chemicals list
There are also a handful of independent groups and brands with lists that aren’t used in the US or EU’s formal fragrance laws:
The Environmental Working Group (EWG): has an Unacceptable list and a Restricted list for personal care products that includes many fragrances.
CleanScents
MADE SAFE: a combination of SVHC….XX
Anything else?
All fragrance molecules from these lists are combined into a single searchable list here:
XX
Are non toxic fragrances just fear mongering? What makes fragrance toxic?
There are a few real reasons. People aren’t overreacting to fragrance being toxic.
Carcinogenic, Mutagenic, or Reprotoxic (CMR): some fragrance chemicals cause cancer, genetic damage, or reproductive harm in animal studies. Methyleugenol, which occurs naturally in some essential oils and is also used in fragrance, is now classified as probably carcinogenic to humans based on animal and mechanistic evidence.
Organ toxins: some fragrance chemicals damage specific organs at high doses in animal studies. That’s why some programs screen for them.
Endocrine disruptors: phthalates are the best known hormone disruptor found in candles and home fragrance. They’re used as fragrance solvents, and back in 2007 as people were becoming aware of this, 12 of 14 air fresheners tested contained phthalates, none listed on the label. This problem persists even now. A 2025 analysis of IFRA (a group focused on the safety of fragrances) found 23 chemicals with evidence of endocrine activity on their own “safe ingredient” list.
Allergens:
Respiratory Sensitizers: chemicals that can trigger asthma-type reactions. Few labels or certifications screen for these.
Skin Sensitizers: once limonene and linalool, common in both essential oils and synthetic blends, are released into air and react with it, they caused skin reactions in around 6% of dermatitis patients. The EU now requires more than 80 fragrance allergens to be named on cosmetic labels. The US has no equivalent rule for candles or home fragrance.
Environmental Pollutants (contributing to long-term human health risk): some synthetic musks, like galaxolide, which is used in lots of comforting-smelling personal care products, bioaccumulate in aquatic organisms and wastewater systems. Natural terpenes like limonene also react with indoor ozone to form formaldehyde and fine particles.
There are very few third party certifications that make sure scents are safe. A few are helpful, a few aren’t, and a few are so-so.
What certifications are there for safe fragrance?
Two are helpful:
EPA Safer Choice: but this mostly cleaning and air care products, not candles. Its fragrance criteria exclude listed carcinogens, mutagens, reproductive toxins, persistent bioaccumulative chemicals, and known respiratory sensitizers. Manufacturers must also disclose skin sensitizers.
California Cleaning Product Right to Know Act: this is a law, not a certification, and it’s actually the strongest fragrance disclosure rule in the US. It covers “air care products” (sprays, plug-ins, diffusers) labeled to freshen air or remove odors. Manufacturers must list fragrance allergens on the label and post more ingredient detail online. If you live outside California, you can still look up the online disclosures. Not usually helpful for candles, unfortunately.
What is IFRA certification?
The International Fragrance Association (IFRA) is the fragrance industry and its standards for fragrance safety come from the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM), which the industry founded in 1966 and still funds. RIFM’s expert panel is independent, but the organization itself isn’t.
IFRA’s standards are public, but an IFRA-certified scent’s ingredients are not required to be public. IFRA sets limits and bans on individual chemicals, but it doesn’t require brands to tell you what’s in their fragrance.
Some chemicals on IFRA’s list of ingredients in use are classified as possible or probable carcinogens, including benzophenone, styrene, and methyleugenol. IFRA does restrict methyleugenol, with concentration limits for each product category. Most IFRA limits are set to prevent skin reactions, so far fewer apply to candles and air fresheners, which aren’t meant to touch skin.
So when a company says its scents are safe because they’re IFRA compliant, that doesn’t mean it’s true. Because IFRA does ban or limit some of the most harmful chemicals, I still consider IFRA-compliant fragrance slightly better than fragrance with no standard at all.
Certifications and phrases for fragrance that aren’t helpful
USDA Biobased / “Certified 100% Plant-Based”: measures where a product’s carbon came from, plants or petroleum, using radiocarbon testing on the finished product. It says nothing about safety. A lab-made aroma chemical built from plant-based starting materials can test as 100% biobased.
Prop 65 compliant: California’s Prop 65 lists chemicals linked to cancer or reproductive harm. “Compliant” can mean no listed chemical is present above the state’s threshold. It can also just mean the product carries the required warning. It doesn’t mean the product is free of concerning chemicals.
Therapeutic grade: no standard and no third-party definition behind it. It’s a marketing term, and in some cases a brand’s own trademark.
IFRA certified: this is fine, but is narrow.
Part 1 of Safe Fragrance: The Scent Itself
Understanding Toxic vs Non-Toxic Scents
A scent is a mixture of small molecules. Knowing where those molecules come from and how they’re processed is the easiest way to understand them.
Reading a Scent Label
Scroll right to see all columns.
| What the label says | What it actually is | Risks |
|---|---|---|
|
Whole-Plant ScentA plant's own mix of dozens to hundreds of scent molecules, in the plant's own ratios. Extracted by steam, pressing, CO2, or solvents. |
|
|
Isolated Single Molecule from a PlantOne molecule separated out of a plant's oil, usually by fractional distillation, which splits molecules apart by boiling point. |
|
|
Isolated Single Molecule from a LabThe exact same molecule found in a plant, made from a different starting material like petrochemicals, lignin (a paper-making byproduct), or another plant. |
|
|
Altered Isolated Single Molecule from a PlantA natural starting molecule chemically changed into a new molecule that doesn't exist in nature. |
|
|
Fully Synthetic Aroma MoleculeA molecule made in a lab that doesn't occur in nature at all. Created to build blends, make scents last longer, or recreate smells plants can't. |
|
"Natural fragrance" shows up in every row on purpose. The term has no legal definition in the US, so a brand can use it for any of these.
Allergy risks affect people who become sensitized. The other risks can affect anyone with enough exposure. Search any ingredient named here in the Check a Fragrance list to see every official list that flags it.
Fragrance Disclosure
Most scented products are blends of several of the five molecule types above, often essential oils and lab-made molecules together. How much a brand discloses limits how high its scent rating can go. The specific ingredients decide where it lands within that limit.
Scroll right to see all columns.
| Disclosure level | What it looks like | What you know | What you don't know | Highest possible scent rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full disclosure | Every scent ingredient named. "Lavandula Angustifolia Oil" or "Linalool, Eucalyptol, Jasmine Absolute." | Every scent ingredient, so you can check each one against the rows above. | Whether a single molecule name came from a plant or a lab, unless the brand tells you. | High SafetyLower if the ingredients include strong sensitizers or carcinogenic constituents. |
| Partial: third-party screen | A certification seal instead of an ingredient list, like MADE SAFE or EPA Safer Choice. | An outside group reviewed the formula against its own list of chemicals to avoid. | The ingredients themselves. The screen is only as strict as its criteria. | Moderate Safety |
| Partial: brand standards | An industry or supplier program instead of an ingredient list, like IFRA compliance (the fragrance industry trade association's own standards) or CleanScents, where the fragrance supplier sets its own standards. | The blend meets rules the industry or supplier wrote for itself. | The ingredients, and whether anyone independent checked. | Low Safety |
| Partial: "made withouts" | "Phthalate-free," "Paraben-free," "Free of Prop 65 chemicals." | A few things that aren't in it. Phthalate-free matters most here: phthalates are used as fragrance solvents and are rarely listed. | What is in it. | Low Safety |
| None | "Fragrance," "Parfum," or just a scent name like "Sea Salt & Orchid," with no other claims. | Nothing about the blend. | Everything. It could be any mix of the five molecule types, plus solvents. In 2007, 12 of 14 air fresheners tested contained phthalates, none listed on the label. | Lowest Safety |
Phthalates aren't scent molecules. They're used as solvents and fixatives that help a scent last, so they travel inside blends and rarely appear on labels.
Highest Safety is reserved for products with no added fragrance.
Specific Types of Scents and Their Toxicity Profiles
Are all essential oils non toxic?
No. Some are carcinogenic. XXXX
Are organic essential oils safer than natural (non-organic) essential oils?
There is very little evidence for this, but in theory, natural (non-organic) plants are typically grown with pesticides and synthetic fertilizers. These chemicals can theoretically remain in the final essential oil or candle, though it’s possible that they’re distilled out and left behind as larger molecules. Third party testing with GC-MS (gas chromatography mass spec) is the best way to know what is actually in an oil.
Are lavender and tea tree oil endocrine disruptors?
There was a lot of debate about this, but in 2022, a large study looking at 556 children found no increased risk of endocrine disorders in kids regularly exposed to these and kids that weren’t.
What is musk, and is it toxic?
Musk was originally a scent taken from a gland of the male musk deer. Today, almost all musk is made in a lab. It’s still around because musk makes a scent last longer and smell soft, warm, or “clean.” It’s rarely named on a label and usually hides inside “fragrance.”
There are three main families of synthetic musk, and they’re very different from a health standpoint.
Nitro musks were the first to be synthesized. They were discovered while chemists were trying to make explosives. The most common one, musk xylene, was named a substance of very high concern in the EU because it’s very persistent and very bioaccumulative. Animal and lab studies also show nitro musks are weakly estrogenic (endocrine disruptors).
Polycyclic musks replaced nitro musks and are the most common nowadays, around 90% of musks used. The best known are galaxolide (labeled hexamethylindanopyran) which is used for it’s “fresh laundry” smell in candles, detergents, fabric softeners and room sprays. And tonalide, a similar smell used in soaps, wax melts, and other house products. The problem is that like PFAS, these build up in people: galaxolide was found in 97% of breast milk samples from Massachusetts mothers. Lab studies show weak estrogenic activity and blocking of other hormones. The EPA released a draft risk evaluation for galaxolide very recently in April 2026, and the EU’s chemicals agency is re-evaluating it as a possible persistent toxic and endocrine disruptor. We don’t have the results yet, but it’s worth being cautious about.
Macrocyclic musks are a third category. So far they seem mostly biodegradable and don’t bioaccumulate. But, Australia found ethylene brassylate, a common one, in rivers. There’s less human health research on them, so no red flags doesn’t mean proven safe. It is possible that these will be a regrettable substitution in the future. Or maybe they won’t. Whether you avoid them is up to your personal level of precaution, of course.
Are synthetic fragrances toxic?
Synthetic fragrances do contain toxic substances, but depending on how much you’re exposed to, how, and what your susceptibility is, they can range from relatively harmless to you, to being associated with a possible negative health risk. There is a lot we don’t know because the mixtures in synthetic fragrances are very complicated, and studying “real life” outside of a lab is very hard. Here’s the breakdown, from the candle, to how you breathe it in, to what happens to your health, in order:
Hazard: we know that there are phthalates, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and VOCs in candles, incense, and other synthetic scents. We know that these are hazardous, that synthetic scents release generally more complex VOCs than unscented candles, and that they cause harm in animal studies. We don’t know how many compounds are in the vast majority of scents, and whether humans respond the same way as animals do.
Exposure: we know that they are released into the air and persist in indoor environments, where we breathe them in.
Dose: we know that at high doses, like mechanics, roofers, and tire manufacturers are exposed to, PAHs are linked to chromosomal changes and bladder cancer risk, but we don’t know if PAH levels from candles in a home are high enough to cause the same risk. We do know that ventilation greatly reduces your dose. We also know that we have many cumulative exposures to these substances in all areas of our life, like diet, other personal care products, and the products you interact with out in the world.
Dose-Response: we know that at many doses, people self-report symptoms like headaches, sneezing, or wheezing. We don’t know if candle or scent phthalates are responsible for endocrine effects— it could be any of the other phthalates you’re exposed to.
Susceptibility: if you have asthma or chemical sensitivity, you may be more susceptible to health effects, even at lower doses than other people. We don’t know if there are gene differences in how people metabolize fragrance compounds.
Risk: There are no long-term studies showing how household candle use or other fragrances cause specific health outcomes.
So, does this mean synthetic fragrance is toxic? While there is no solid evidence of risk yet, that doesn’t mean there is no risk. Because there is so much uncertainty, many people choose to apply the precautionary principle and skip synthetic fragrance whenever possible. It also means that someone else could say, “levels are so low they won’t harm you” or blow off candle caution entirely. This will come down to your personality and other aspects of your worldview. I go into this in depth in my (free) What Does “Non-Toxic” Actually Mean? course.
Part 4 of Fragrance: Dispersal Method
What is evaporation?
Evaporation is when a liquid scent drifts into the air on its own over time, similar to how a puddle evaporates on a sunny day. This is how reed diffusers, scented gels and beads, sachets, and potpourri work. It’s also what happens after you spritz a scent from a regular pump or trigger bottle: the water evaporates into the air.
Fan diffusers speed up the process. They blow air across a pad soaked in scent. Think of using a small fan to help the scent evaporate faster.
Evaporation adds the fewest extra things to your air. There’s no flame or propellant-forced mist, so what you breathe is mostly the scent molecules themselves. That doesn’t make it risk-free: scent molecules still react with ozone indoors no matter how they get into the air (more on that in the scent section above).
Plug ins and wax warmers
Both of these use heat without a flame. Wax warmers melt scented wax cubes. Plug-in air fresheners actually use heat and a wick that draws up scented liquid.
Wax melts are often marketed as the cleaner alternative to candles, which makes some sense because you’re not burning something inside your house, however, they may actually release more of a specific type of air pollutant, terpenes. Purdue researchers measured more monoterpenes released from scented wax melts than from scented candles. The probably is that those terpenes reacted with indoor ozone to form nanoparticles, and the researchers estimated a person could inhale a similar amount as from candles or gas stoves. The authors also say more toxicology research is needed on what breathing these particles actually does.
Plug-ins use heat, too, but unlike wax warmers are designed for constant output, even when you’re not home. They deliver a steady stream of scent compounds into the room.
What is nebulized or ultrasonic diffusion?
Ultrasonic and nebulizing diffusers work differently from evaporation, including evaporative fan-based diffusers. They push tiny droplets into the air.
Ultrasonic diffusers hold water with a few drops of oil. A plate vibrates at a high frequency and breaks the water into a fine mist that carries the oil with it. Anything else in the water goes airborne too. The EPA notes these devices are very efficient at releasing the minerals in tap water into the air, and a Virginia Tech study found tap water in an ultrasonic humidifier raised room particle counts nearly 13 times, while distilled water raised them only slightly. That research was on humidifiers, which use the same technology. If you use an ultrasonic diffuser, use distilled water.
Nebulizers use no water at all. They turn undiluted fragrance oil into an aerosol, so you get a more concentrated output.
Both produce small airborne particles. Chamber studies have measured particles in the 10–100 nanometer range from ultrasonic diffusers, which is small enough to reach deep into the lungs. The research here is early, and the health effects of routinely breathing nanoparticles from diffusers aren’t well characterized. I think caution is reasonable.
What are aerosols?
Technically, an aerosol is any suspension of fine liquid or solid particles in air, so every spray makes one. But in normal everyday use, “aerosol” means a pressurized can that uses gas to propel the contents out as a very fine mist. Think spray paint, or canned room sprays like Febreze Air.
The difference from pressurized bottles and regular bottles is how long the particles stay in the air. In a chamber study of cleaning sprays, particles from pressurized cans took about twice as long to settle as particles from regular spray bottles. More time in the air means more time to breathe it in, so it’s more important that the scent is safe.
What are propellants?
Propellants are the compressed gases in aerosol cans that force the scent out as a powerful mist. In the “olden days,” this gas was CFCs, or chlorofluorocarbons. The US banned CFCs as aerosol propellants in 1978 because they damage the ozone layer. Brands mostly switched to hydrocarbon propellants so today that usually means propane, butane, and isobutane, or compressed gases like nitrogen or CO2. Since propellants are released into the air along with the product, what they are can impact your indoor air quality. Even in they come out in very small quantities with each spray, if you use a spray very often, it can potentially add up.
What is the difference between nitrogen and other gas propellants?
Hydrocarbon propellants like propane, butane, and isobutane are the most common in consumer aerosols. They’re flammable and add to your indoor VOC load, though a single spray delivers a small amount.
The bigger concern is contamination. Starting in 2021, an independent lab found benzene, a known human carcinogen, in many personal care aerosols. The FDA pointed to the propellant isobutane as one possible source. Those were deodorants, dry shampoos, and sunscreens, not air fresheners. But they show the broader problem: aerosols contain several ingredients besides the scent, and full disclosure is rare.
Nitrogen is the most inert option because it doesn’t react with much. It’s less common because it doesn’t keep pressure as steady as the can empties. If a safety data sheet lists nitrogen as the propellant, that’s the better choice among aerosols. Skipping aerosols for home fragrance altogether is the simpler move when alternatives exist.
And yes, it’s true that one spray won’t hurt you on its own. But, we’re constantly exposed to poor air quality, so if you can make this change without added stress, I think it’s a good idea.
Why is burning a candle bad for you?
Burning anything indoors (candles, incense, palo santo, sage, even food on the stove) creates combustion byproducts. For candles, that includes carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxides, formaldehyde, benzene, PAHs, PM2.5, and ultrafine particles. Burning also releases the fragrance compounds themselves, whether they’re natural or synthetic.
PM2.5 is the same pollutant behind wildfire smoke advisories and outdoor air quality warnings. Chronic exposure at high levels is associated with cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, and emerging research links it to cognitive decline. That said, occasional candle use in a ventilated room is a very different exposure from the outdoor and occupational studies behind those associations. One large chamber study found most calculated indoor levels from candles were well below guidance values. Still, the direction of the evidence is a reasonable basis for keeping indoor combustion to a minimum, especially since you likely have other daily combustion sources like cooking or gas heating.
If you do burn candles, ventilation is helpful.
Is incense worse than candles?
Yes. Burning incense is smoldering combustion, and produces more than 45 mg of particles per gram burned, compared with about 10 mg for cigarettes. Incense smoke also contains carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, benzene, toluene, xylenes, aldehydes, and PAHs. A French study found benzene and formaldehyde emissions from scented candles were far lower than from incense, and incense cones put out more formaldehyde than sticks.
FYI: How and why I use the words non-toxic, chemical-free, toxin, and toxic
I use the words non-toxic, chemical, toxin and toxic, even though there is no agreed-upon definition of the term non-toxic, and that everything, even water, is made of chemicals, so nothing is truly chemical-free. Likewise, toxin refers to a natural substance like a plant poison or venom, whereas toxicant is a more accurate term for the chemicals in products that have a negative health impact. I recognize that something that is toxic does not automatically make it a health risk.
I choose to use these scientifically inaccurate words anyway purely for practical purposes, for now. This is because these words are currently the most culturally agreed-upon, descriptive, and accessible terms that allow people to find the information they’re looking for.
In short, “non-toxic” is shorthand for a complicated problem. I’ll update my terminology if this changes!
Don’t see what you’re looking for? Request a review, or check it yourself in seconds with the Second Opinion Product Checker. Spot something outdated? Let me know and I’ll update it. Join the spam-free newsletter for interesting info and to hear when new reviews are up.
FYI, “non-toxic” has no official definition, so I rate every product with the same method. It’s built on third-party certifications and published test data, not brand claims. For a deeper dive, my free course walks you through it.
Everything on Interior Medicine is educational information, not medical advice. Read my full disclaimer.
More Healthy Design For You




